Why are laptops and phones getting more expensive because of AI?

Because memory for AI servers and memory for your devices come from the same few factories and the same silicon wafers, and AI memory needs about three times the wafer for the same capacity. As wafers shift to AI, ordinary memory gets scarcer and dearer, and device makers pass part of that on.

Business & Economy · 2026-10-02

The AI boom runs on the same chips as your laptop

On September 30, a company most people have never heard of reported the biggest quarter in its history. Micron took in 54.23 billion dollars in revenue, about 4.8 times the 11.32 billion it earned in the same quarter a year earlier. It makes memory, the chips that hold whatever a computer or phone is working on at a given moment. Three months earlier, Apple had raised the prices of its Macs and iPads and pointed to a memory shortage driven by AI.

It is easy to picture the AI boom happening somewhere else, in data centers full of machines that have nothing to do with the phone in your pocket. That picture is wrong in one precise way. The memory inside an AI server and the memory inside your laptop are cut from the same silicon discs, in the same factories, by the same few companies. When one side takes more, the other gets less.

Micron's quarterly revenue grew about 4.8 times in a year · Micron revenue in its fiscal fourth quarter, in billions of US dollars · A year earlier · 11.32 · 11.32 billion dollars · Fiscal Q4 2026 · 54.23 · 54.23 billion dollars · Reported on September 30, 2026
Micron revenue in its fiscal fourth quarter, in billions of US dollars

Three companies make most of the world's computer memory

The kind of memory at stake is called DRAM, and it sits in every laptop, phone and server. In the second quarter of 2026, three companies took 87.6 percent of all the money spent on it, nearly nine in ten, according to the market research firm TrendForce : Samsung with 39.4 percent, SK hynix with 24.9 percent and Micron with 23.3 percent. That is a share of sales, not of factory capacity, and another tracker, Counterpoint Research, splits it a little differently while arriving at about the same total.

A Chinese maker, CXMT, has been gaining ground in ordinary memory, though it is too early to say whether the three leaders' share is in lasting decline. For now, when these three decide what to make, the whole market follows.

Three companies take nearly nine in ten dollars spent on DRAM · Share of DRAM revenue, second quarter of 2026 · Samsung · SK hynix · Micron · 39.4% · 24.9% · 23.3% · All other makers · TrendForce figures. A share of sales, not of factory capacity
Share of DRAM revenue, second quarter of 2026

AI memory needs about three times the silicon for the same capacity

Memory chips are printed on round silicon wafers, and a factory can only process so many wafers a month. Each wafer can be turned into ordinary memory for PCs and phones, or into the special memory that AI chips need. That special kind is called high-bandwidth memory, or HBM : chips stacked on top of each other so they can feed data to an AI processor very fast.

Speed costs space. Micron has said that its current AI memory, HBM3E, consumes approximately three times the wafer supply of DDR5, the ordinary memory in new computers, to make the same amount of memory on the same manufacturing process. At the Hot Chips conference in August 2026, a Micron engineer said the gap is not shrinking with newer generations, and the company expects it to be larger for the next one. The ratio is a comparison between these products, not a fixed rate for every memory chip.

So moving a wafer from ordinary memory to AI memory is not a one-for-one swap. It gives up roughly three units of ordinary memory for every one unit of AI memory. A Samsung executive, Kim Taewoo, told Reuters that HBM takes about 20 percent of the industry's DRAM wafer capacity today and should take nearly 30 percent next year. Separately, TrendForce forecasts that by the end of 2027, HBM will take about 30 percent of the wafers at the three biggest makers while yielding only about 13 percent of their DRAM by capacity.

AI memory is forecast to take far more wafers than the memory it yields · HBM's share at the three biggest DRAM makers by the end of 2027, in percent · Share of wafers · Share of DRAM capacity · About 30% · About 13% · TrendForce forecast. Both figures are approximate
HBM's share at the three biggest DRAM makers by the end of 2027, in percent

Why the wafers go to AI first

Memory makers choose where their wafers go, and AI customers are the ones they choose first. The large cloud companies building AI data centers buy in huge volumes and lock in supply with long-term agreements. TrendForce reported that DRAM makers were "reallocating capacity toward HBM and server applications" in the second quarter, while cutting what they shipped to PC makers.

Not all of that pull is HBM. AI data centers also buy large amounts of ordinary server memory, and TrendForce found that in the first quarter of 2026 ordinary DDR5 server memory actually earned more per wafer than HBM. What puts AI buyers first is the size and length of their contracts, not a premium that always holds. Makers' inventories of memory are also historically low, which gives them more power over prices.

The result shows up in contract prices, the prices device makers pay memory makers under deals agreed each quarter. TrendForce forecast that contract prices for ordinary DRAM would rise 58 to 63 percent in the second quarter of 2026 over the first, which had itself set a record. For the third quarter it forecast a smaller rise of 13 to 18 percent, partly because PC and phone makers cannot absorb much more. Both are forecasts, not measured price changes.

Memory contract prices were forecast to keep rising, more slowly by summer · Forecast rise in ordinary DRAM contract prices over the previous quarter, in percent · Q2 2026 · Q3 2026 · 58 to 63% · 13 to 18% · TrendForce forecasts, not measured price changes
Forecast rise in ordinary DRAM contract prices over the previous quarter, in percent

Memory and storage are set to go from a sixth to nearly a quarter of a PC's parts cost

In February, the research firm Gartner forecast that combined prices for DRAM and SSD storage would rise 130 percent by the end of 2026. On that basis it expected memory and storage to reach 23 percent of the cost of the parts in a PC, up from 16 percent in 2025, and the average price of a PC to rise 17 percent and of a smartphone 13 percent compared with 2025.

Storage is made from a different kind of chip, called NAND flash, so the three-to-one wafer arithmetic above explains only the memory half of that forecast. And these are forecasts and averages across all PCs and phones. A 17 percent average does not mean every laptop costs 17 percent more. Gartner expects the cheapest devices to be hit hardest, because a thin margin leaves the least room to absorb a costlier part.

Memory and storage are set to take a bigger slice of what a PC's parts cost · Memory and storage as a share of a PC's parts cost, in percent · 2025 · 16 · 16% · End of 2026, forecast · 23 · 23% · Gartner forecast from February 2026, averaged across all PCs
Memory and storage as a share of a PC's parts cost, in percent

Apple, LG and Samsung have already raised their prices

On June 25, Apple raised the prices of Macs and iPads. The MacBook Air had launched in March starting at 1,099 dollars ; after the increase, the model with 512GB of storage cost 1,299 dollars. According to AP reporting, Apple attributed the increases to a shortage of memory chips driven by the expansion of AI data centers.

In South Korea, LG raised prices on some of its gram laptops from April 1. The 2026 gram 16 went from 3.14 million won to 3.54 million won. Samsung raised prices on its Galaxy Book6 laptops at the same time.

Phones follow by a different road. Their memory is a mobile variety of DRAM, made in the same factories, and TrendForce reported in July that smartphone makers were expected to raise retail prices in the third quarter to offset its persistently high cost.

LG raised the price of its 2026 gram 16 laptop in April · Price of LG's 2026 gram 16 in South Korea, in millions of won · Before April 1 · 3.14 · 3.14 million won · From April 1 · 3.54 · 3.54 million won · LG raised prices on some of its gram laptops from April 1, 2026
Price of LG's 2026 gram 16 in South Korea, in millions of won

The price of your phone now depends on how a wafer is divided

The fact to keep is not this year's percentages, which will move. It is the arrangement underneath them : a handful of companies make the memory for both AI servers and everyday devices, from one shared supply of wafers, and today's AI memory needs about three times the wafer that ordinary memory needs for the same capacity. As long as AI buyers sign bigger and longer contracts, ordinary devices compete for a tighter remainder. That is not the only reason a given laptop costs more, since storage, low inventories and makers' pricing all play a part, but it is the one most people never see.

Whatever changes that arrangement will also have to run through the wafers. New factories take years to build and fill. A maker that adds ordinary memory, as CXMT has been doing, adds ordinary supply. And if demand for AI servers cooled, the wafers would flow back. Until one of those moves, the price on a laptop or phone is partly set in decisions made far from the store.

How AI demand reaches the price of your laptop · The chain from shared memory factories to the price of a device · Shared wafers · AI buyers first · Three for one · Tighter remainder · Higher prices · A few makers cut AI and everyday memory from the same wafers · Bigger, longer contracts pull wafers
The chain from shared memory factories to the price of a device
Why are laptops and phones getting more expensive because of AI?Why are laptops and phones getting more expensive because of AI?The memory in an AI server and the memory in your laptop come from the same factories. · Samsung, SK hynix and Micron took nearly nine in ten dollars spent on DRAM in the second quarter of 2026. · ※ DRAM : the memory in every laptop, phone and serverAI memory needs about three times the silicon for the same capacity. · Micron's comparison of its current AI memory with the ordinary memory in new computers※ HBM : memory chips stacked on top of each other to feed data to AI processors very fast · Share of wafers · Share of DRAM capacity · About 30% · About 13% · AI memory is forecast to take far more wafers than the memory it yields · HBM's share at the three biggest DRAM makers by the end of 2027, inMemory makers choose where their wafers go, and AI customers are the ones they choose first. · Large cloud companies buy in huge volumes and lock in supply with long-term agreements.Device makers are passing the cost on · Apple : Macs and iPads from June 25, citing a memory shortage driven by AI, per AP · LG : some gram laptops in South Korea, from April 1 · Samsung : Galaxy Book6 laptops in South Korea, at the same time · Phone makers : expected to raise retail prices in the tThe price of your phone now depends on how a wafer is divided. · It is not the only reason. Storage, low inventories and makers' pricing all play a part, but this is the one most people never see.Sources 14 : sec.gov · Micron Technology, Inc. reports results for the fourth quarter and full year of fiscal 2026 (SEC filing), investors.micron.com · Micron reports record fiscal fourth quarter and full year 2026 results, pbs.org · PBS NewsHour : Apple increases prices for Macs and iPads, blamingRead the full story at · polora.ai

Why is your next laptop or phone more expensive because of AI?

Alpha · claude-sonnet-5

Good — I've spent my search budget on the three load-bearing claims. Here's what checks out, what needs correction, and where the argument is weakest. The premise holds. The core mechanism — a tiny oligopoly reallocating shared wafer capacity from ordinary DRAM to AI memory — is real and well sourced. I'd push back on only one thing: the manuscript treats this as a clean, stable story, when the sourcing itself shows the numbers are moving fast and inconsistently across trackers. That matters for how confidently a reader should take any single percentage. Micron's quarter — confirmed as written, with a nuance. The SEC filing and multiple outlets confirm revenue of $54.23 billion for fiscal Q4 2026 against $133.19 billion in revenue for fiscal 2026, up from $37.38 billion a year earlier. The quarter-over-quarter figure matches: revenue for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, covering June through August, came to $54.23 billion... nearly five times the figure from a year earlier and marks the company's highest quarterly revenue on record. The manuscript's "4.8 times" is right if compared to the *same quarter* a year earlier ($11.32B → $54.23B), which multiple outlets corrobor…

Beta · gpt-6-sol

The premise stands, but the manuscript makes the mechanism too absolute. AI demand is competing with PCs and phones for DRAM production capacity; HBM’s unusually heavy use of that capacity helps tighten ordinary-memory supply. It does not follow that every wafer could simply be switched between products, that HBM is always the most profitable use of a wafer, or that every device’s price increase can be attributed to HBM alone. Here is my claim-by-claim check, as of October 2, 2026: | Manuscript claim | Finding and conditions | |---|---| | Micron reported $54.23 billion on September 30, about 4.8 times a year earlier. | Supported. Micron reports $54.229 billion for fiscal Q4 2026 versus $11.315 billion in *the comparable quarter* of 2025—not versus its entire previous fiscal year. The quarter ended September 3. (investors.micron.com) | | Three firms took 87.6% of Q2 DRAM revenue; CXMT is eroding their share. | Supported with a time limit. TrendForce gives Samsung 39.4%, SK hynix 24.…

Gamma · gemini-3.1-pro

The premise of the manuscript stands—the shift of wafer capacity toward HBM for AI servers is indeed a major driver of memory scarcity—but the piece contains a structural blind spot that a careful reader will catch. It conflates DRAM (system memory) with NAND flash (storage), attributing the entire price hike of devices to the DRAM wafer trade-off. Here is my evaluation of the claims, building on the groundwork laid by Alpha and Beta, with the specific corrections the next stage needs: The strongest argument against the manuscript's angle: The manuscript rests its financial impact on Gartner’s forecast of a 130% price surge and a 17% increase in average PC prices. But Gartner explicitly states this 130% surge is for combined DRAM and solid-state drive (SSD) prices. SSDs are made of NAND flash, not DRAM. HBM does not directly displace NAND flash on the same silicon wafers in the way it displaces ordinary DDR5 DRAM. While AI data centers are also buying up high-capacity enterprise SSDs (creating a parallel shortage), the manuscript's core mechanical explanation—"three wafers' worth of room for every one it replaces"—applies only to DRAM. The piece currently implies the sha…

Researcher · gemini-3-7-flash

Factual Verification & Source Grounding Here is the point-by-point factual check of the manuscript's key claims against primary filings and industry data: --- 1. Micron’s Record Quarter & Revenue Surge * Manuscript Claim: On Sept 30, Micron reported $54.23B in revenue, about 4.8× what it took in a year earlier. * Finding: Supported, with precise scope. * Micron’s fiscal Q4 2026 earnings report shows quarterly revenue of $54.229 billion (quarter ended September 3) vs. $11.315 billion in the comparable fiscal Q4 of the prior year (a ~4.8× increase). It must be framed as a *year-over-year quarterly comparison*, not against full-year revenue. * Source: Micron Investor Relations Q4 Press Release --- 2. The DRAM Oligopoly & Market Share (87.6%) * Manuscript Claim: Three companies took 87.6% of DRAM revenue in Q2 2026 (Samsung 39.4%, SK hynix 24.9%, Micron 23.3%), with the share slowly falling due to CXMT. * Finding: Supported for revenue shares; trend characterization needs nuance…

The Arbiter · gpt-6-sol

Round record Alpha, Beta, Gamma and the Researcher agree that the manuscript’s central premise stands: AI demand is tightening the supply of memory used in PCs and phones. They also agree that the manuscript makes the path from an AI server to a retail price sound more direct and exclusive than the evidence warrants. TrendForce describes both HBM allocation and demand for *conventional server DRAM*, alongside low inventories and curtailed consumer supply. (trendforce.com) The checks established these points: - Micron: Its September 30 release reports $54.229 billion for fiscal Q4 2026, versus $11.315 billion in the *same quarter a year earlier*—about 4.8 times as much. The comparison is not with an earlier full year. (investors.micron.com) - Three suppliers: TrendForce gives Samsung 39.4%, SK hynix 24.9% and Micron 23.3% of Q2 2026 DRAM revenue, totaling 87.6%. That is a revenue share, not a share of wafers. Beta and the Researcher reported…

The Arbiter's Final Verdict · gpt-6-sol

The premise stands, but the manuscript makes the link too absolute. AI data centers are competing with PCs and phones for memory-making capacity. Samsung, SK hynix and Micron accounted for 87.6% of second-quarter 2026 DRAM revenue, according to TrendForce. Those suppliers can devote capacity to high-bandwidth memory (HBM) for AI processors rather than conventional DRAM. Micron’s approximately three-to-one wafer-capacity comparison for HBM3E versus DDR5, on the same process node, explains why that shift can squeeze the supply of ordinary DRAM. It is not a rule for every memory chip or device. There is evidence of higher costs, but the figures describe different things. TrendForce’s 58–63% for Q2 and 13–18% for Q3 were *forecasts of quarterly ordinary-DRAM contract-price increases*, not measured increases in laptop prices (Q2 forecast; Q3 reporting). [Gartner](https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-02-26-gartner-says-surging-memory-costs-will-reduce…